21 November 2020

Flickr photos, groups, and tags related to the 'manke' Flickr tag.

Search This Blog Mrs. Gent reads.Some Dogs Do on June 21, 2020 0. Space continued (w.b. 15.06.20) on June 14, 2020.
TV Logic VFM-058W compact 1920 x 1080 video monitor. TVLogic WFM-056WP Monitor/Viewfinder; Northern Lights Live 2012. Aurora – Jan 23rd 2012; January 24th Solar Storm Aurora Pictures and Video. Using LUT’s on set and in DaVinci Resolve with the PMW-F5/F55/F3 and FS700. Guide to the PMW-F55 and F5; Guides and Info for A7s. Guides and info.
CHELSEA 19-20 KITS - EMPTY SPACES THE BLOG Olahraga pinimg.com Empty Spaces on Twitter: 'New #PSG Nike Hm/Aw/Th 2015-2016. Twimg.com Manchester City Pes Kit weebly.com.

The story goes that all castle staircases turn clockwise so that primarily right-handed defenders, fighting downwards, would have an advantage over attackers whose weapon would be impeded by the newel post. It is a particular favourite of tour guides, appears in castle guidebooks (Hodgson & Wise 2015, 46) and interpretation panels (for example at Arundel Castle, West Sussex), has been included in many popular texts (Mortimer 2009, 160), gets incorporated into television documentaries, is widely present in internet articles and is liberally recited by members of online discussion forums.

Of all the stories connected to mediaeval buildings this is perhaps the one that has been the most resilient. Unlike many other mediaeval tales that I have researched there does not seem to be a shred of truth behind it. For some folk this can be quite a controversial opinion. Attempting to gently puncture the swordsman theory of spiral staircases gets a lot of pushback online. One reason for this might be the frequency of its repetition by parents to children. Whilst working at or visiting castles I inevitably hear a dad proudly imparting this knowledge to his little boy (and it usually is boys’ talk) and it may be that this familial link creates a strong bond between the myth and its proponents.

[EDIT: Within a matter of hours of publishing this post one kind gent on a discussion forum had already publicly declared it as “drivel” – it’s odd what folk will get wound up about on the internet.]

It is not the purpose of this blog post to outline all of the evidence against the swordsman theory. That data will eventually appear in the content of a book that I am working on looking at mediaeval building myths. However, before looking in detail at how this myth developed it might be worth making four broad points:

The swordsman theory is predicated upon the belief that castles were intrinsically designed as military structures. Going back as far as the 1970s, and gaining widespread recognition in the 1990s, castle specialists have proposed that these buildings were primarily structures intended to be impressive theatrical backdrops for complex ceremonies relating to status and prestige. Secondly, they were lavish residences and only finally was there some consideration of fortification – which was often symbolic and rather ineffective. This is not to say that castles could not be used in times of warfare – demonstrably they were – but such moments were vanishingly rare (Liddiard 2005, 6-11; Johnson 2002, xiii-xix; Coulson 1979, 74).
If staircases were genuinely engineered for military purposes, then we should always find that they turn clockwise. However, as scholars such as Neil Guy and Charles Ryder have demonstrated, there are a substantial minority of newels which turn anti-clockwise (approximately 30% of all surviving examples).
Critics point out that anti-clockwise newels are far more prevalent in late mediaeval castles – a time when it is commonly (and wrongly) assumed that defence was less paramount. However, there are many examples of anti-clockwise staircases in castles that were built during periods of conquest and war in hotly disputed territories. In the eleventh century, two of William the Bastard’s conquest castles – Norwich and the Tower of London contain them. The following century buildings constructed during the period of the Anarchy, including Newark, have anti-clockwise newels. Meanwhile, examples built in the north at Helmsley and Richmond were vulnerable to Scottish incursions. During the thirteenth century conquest of Wales both Gilbert de Clare and Edward I patronised anti-clockwise newels in their castles at Caerphilly, Conwy, Beaumaris and Caernarfon.
The direction of a spiral staircase was an architectural decision, not a military one. They were high status structures which allowed vertical movement between prestigious spaces in a castle. If a rare siege resulted in fighting on the staircases then the game really was up.

Despite this, the swordsman theory is a vastly popular story – so much so that I wanted to try and trace its origins to better understand it. I began that task under the assumption that it would probably first crop up in the writings of either eighteenth century antiquarians or nineteenth century military historians. Castles were a fairly late addition to archaeological research and one of the very earliest people to look at this class of monument was the French architect Eugène Viollet-le-Duc (1814-79). As a military engineer, who saw active service during the siege of Paris, he should have been well-placed to advance the swordsman theory. However, in a 43 page discussion on the subject Viollet-le-Duc concluded that spiral staircases were ‘only a means of reaching the upper floors of a dwelling.’

Instead, the earliest citation of the swordsman theory that I have been able to determine is in the writings of an English art critic by the name of Sir Theodore Andrea Cook (1867-1929). Cook first incorporated the story in his 1902 essay on spiral staircases entitled The Shell of Leonardo (Cook 1902, 106). This was then reprinted the following year as a chapter in his book Spirals in Nature and Art:

‘‘It is worth observing, however, at this stage of our inquiry, that while it was easier and more natural for a right-handed architect to draw plans for a staircase with a right-handed spiral, this “leiotropic” formation is not invariably better; for a man ascending it and turning perpetually to the left would always have his right hand free to attack the defenders, and the garrison coming down would expose their left hands on the outside.’

Cook ruminated that a right-handed architect would automatically wish to design an anti-clockwise stair so that the right hand would always be furthest away from the newel post whilst ascending. However, in his mind, this would have afforded a right-handed attacker the advantage over defenders who would find the swing of their weapons cramped. Correspondingly, his belief was that the designers of castles went against their natural instincts so as to facilitate a better defensive scheme.

Aspects of Cook’s life and interests may explain why he may have come to this conclusion. The subject matter of his 1903 book – spirals – immediately focused his mind towards staircases. His writing also betrays a powerful curiosity about which hand was favoured by significant individuals from both history and his own era. In particular, he was taken with the notion that left-handed people were excessively talented in their chosen fields including the Benjamite sling-shotters from the Bible, Leonardo da Vinci, Hans Holbein and the French Olympian fencers Lucien Mérignac and Alphonse Kirchhoffer.

The reason for his focus on these obscure French fencers is that he was himself a man absolutely obsessed with the sport. He set up the Oxford University Fencing Club in 1891, wrote a fencing column for the Daily Telegraph (under the pseudonym Old Blue), served on the committee of the Amateur Fencing Association (1904-1928) and the council of the British Olympic Association from 1905 until 1920. Given his triple interests in swordsmanship, the hand which men favoured and the bearing of a spiral’s turn, Cook was in a unique position to make a connection between the three. He may have been the first to offer an original explanation as to why most castle staircases turned in a clockwise direction.

If there is an earlier citation than Cook’s, then it failed to make an impact. Within a decade the writer Guy Cadogan Rothery (1912, 51-52) had repeated the swordsman theory and specifically referenced Cook in his bibliography. It was then

Gent 1920 Kitsempty Spaces The Blog